JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 19, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Humberto De Jesus Longas Londoño

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el escrito de subsanación presentado por el actor no corrigió los yerros identificados en el auto de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación considera que le asiste razón a la magistrada sustanciadora al señalar que la fundamentación de la censura no cumple los requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia y, en tal medida, decide CONFIRMAR el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 7 de mayo de 2020, a traves del cual se rechazo la demanda correspondiente al expediente D-13666, contentivo de la accion publica de inconstitucionalidad formulada por el ciudadano Humberto de Jesus Longas Londono, contra los articulos 3, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33 (parcial), 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 48, 49, 61, 62 (parcial), 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 73, 76, 77, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 112, 113, 115, 116, 120 (parcial), 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135 (parcial), 136 (parcial) y 160 (parcial) de la Ley 2010 de 2019, "por medio de la cual se adoptan normas para la promocion del crecimiento economico, el empleo, la inversion, el fortalecimiento de las finanzas publicas y la progresividad, equidad y eficiencia del sistema tributario, de acuerdo con los objetivos que sobre la materia impulsaron la Ley 1943 de 2018 y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional a comunicar el contenido de esta decision a los recurrentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.